: Having a sense of proportion
I am no longer a Quaker - haven't been for over 20 years. (Discovering I am an atheist, to my mind, pretty much terminates being a Quaker.)
But I retain the Quaker sense that one should try to live one's life with consistent values - this is why I am banned from Livejournal.
But... what this goes along with, is - though I can try to live my life with consistent ethics in all matters - I do not think that every issue has the same value. Certainly not just because it's happening to me.
I could quit Livejournal, and refuse to join Dreamwidth, because I detest the idea promoted that motherhood is obscene - the idea, upheld by LJ Abuse when headed by Denise Paolucci, that a photo of a baby breastfeeding is more obscene that a soft-porn shot of a woman with artfully blurred nipples, and it's more important to ban such images from Livejournal than it is to ban people who post cartoony images of women being tortured.
My quitting Livejournal and refusing to join Dreamwidth is a decision that primarily affects only me. Insofar as it affects anyone else, it encourages the promotion of fandom and friendship across journalsites - for diversity and decentralisation: which I also think are good things.
I think the discrimination against mothers and the sexualisation of women's bodies implicit in the Livejournal ban is an important issue: I do not, compared with many other things I care about, think Livejournal's ban and rewriting of the rules was ever a particularly important issue - it mattered to me (and possibly to others who friended me) on a personal level.
This is a rambly post which may become a more coherent one about broader issues, once I've thought things through a bit more.
I'm just thinking: these issues that we bump into all the time in fandom space (the neuroscientists who thought fans were lab rats, the sexist guys who have problems with Scans Daily being slash fan space, the anti-slash fans who want to make sure we know they're sure their heroes can't be gay, whether Spike is a hero or a villain or just another blond with a tortured gaze, if Doctor 10 was a Doctor Gone Wrong for mindwiping instead of saving Donna... they all relate to larger issues (except maybe Spike) but they're not, in and of themselves, important. Except maybe the anti-slash fans when they were noisy, but they seem to have quieted down a lot of recent years.) But sometimes (like recently - not someone on my flist or likely to be reading this) you run into someone who seems to have lost track of that, who's got the impression that if it matters to them it's of Global Importance.
Which is disturbing, really.
Tags: fannishness, join us on the outside, lj abuse did what???, slash
I am no longer a Quaker - haven't been for over 20 years. (Discovering I am an atheist, to my mind, pretty much terminates being a Quaker.)
But I retain the Quaker sense that one should try to live one's life with consistent values - this is why I am banned from Livejournal.
But... what this goes along with, is - though I can try to live my life with consistent ethics in all matters - I do not think that every issue has the same value. Certainly not just because it's happening to me.
I could quit Livejournal, and refuse to join Dreamwidth, because I detest the idea promoted that motherhood is obscene - the idea, upheld by LJ Abuse when headed by Denise Paolucci, that a photo of a baby breastfeeding is more obscene that a soft-porn shot of a woman with artfully blurred nipples, and it's more important to ban such images from Livejournal than it is to ban people who post cartoony images of women being tortured.
My quitting Livejournal and refusing to join Dreamwidth is a decision that primarily affects only me. Insofar as it affects anyone else, it encourages the promotion of fandom and friendship across journalsites - for diversity and decentralisation: which I also think are good things.
I think the discrimination against mothers and the sexualisation of women's bodies implicit in the Livejournal ban is an important issue: I do not, compared with many other things I care about, think Livejournal's ban and rewriting of the rules was ever a particularly important issue - it mattered to me (and possibly to others who friended me) on a personal level.
This is a rambly post which may become a more coherent one about broader issues, once I've thought things through a bit more.
I'm just thinking: these issues that we bump into all the time in fandom space (the neuroscientists who thought fans were lab rats, the sexist guys who have problems with Scans Daily being slash fan space, the anti-slash fans who want to make sure we know they're sure their heroes can't be gay, whether Spike is a hero or a villain or just another blond with a tortured gaze, if Doctor 10 was a Doctor Gone Wrong for mindwiping instead of saving Donna... they all relate to larger issues (except maybe Spike) but they're not, in and of themselves, important. Except maybe the anti-slash fans when they were noisy, but they seem to have quieted down a lot of recent years.) But sometimes (like recently - not someone on my flist or likely to be reading this) you run into someone who seems to have lost track of that, who's got the impression that if it matters to them it's of Global Importance.
Which is disturbing, really.
Current Mood:
thoughtful
