yonmei

Recent Entries

You are viewing the most recent 11 entries

July 5th, 2009

10:36 pm: Le weekend: and watching AI:AI
I'm extending the weekend with TOIL tomorrow for Pride last Saturday. It's time I took it. But. I have spent a weekend doing Not Very Much, not even housework.

I have a bunch of things Not Working at the moment: my landline is not working properly: one of the TV boxes is not working (which I suspect is probably Bob's doing, since she used to like to sleep on it: on the other hand I've had it since February 2004, so it wouldn't be impossible that it's just stopped working) and neither my VCR nor my DVD player are working properly (I suspect with both it's the remote controls rather than the players, but the problem with modern technology is that once the remote controls go, the boxes are no longer very usable: and my broadban Internet connection is dead - though Virgin Media were making noises about how "our engineers are aware of the fault and fixing it!" I'm posting this via my T-Mobile dongle. (Also, though this is hardly on the same level of Not Working, two of my cute baby dragons died - and again after they'd had enough clicks and views to grow up. Bah.)

I am watching AI: Artificial Intelligence, and thinking about the Keptverse. (Which is, if you haven't been following, the AU North America in which debt and birth slavery exist - and in which it is legal for parents to sell their minor children into slavery, developed by [info]poisontaster.)

The first half hour or so of AI:AI is about Monica, a woman who cannot get over the death of her son - because technically he isn't dead: he's deep-frozen, in stasis. So her husband buys her a very expensive toy - a mecha, a humanoid robot, shaped like a small boy, with the functional capacity to be bonded permanently to its owner - to thereafter behave as if it had an emotional attachment to its "parent". Which does, in fact, console the woman enormously - she can love and play with her mecha "boy" . But then the woman's son can be awakened and cured.

...and it turns into the story of a Pinocchio. The toy who wants to be a real boy. Which the real son makes clear to the toy by having his mother read the story to him. (Also, of course, because the film-maker wouldn't count on an American audience remembering Pinocchio unless it was associated.)

But, watching it, I thought it would be easy - if [info]poisontaster weren't against any fanfic that isn't RPF written in this universe - to write a fannish retake on the film. Because it is a story about slavery - if you can say that an intelligent toy is enslaved.

It's not something [info]poisontaster deals with directly in the Keptverse: and [info]darkrose only indirectly: what if a couple who wanted a child/didn't want one - the same kind of ambiguous emotional state Monica's in when her son is frozen - instead of adopting a baby, bought one... and then got their real child back? Old enough - as Monica's son is in the film - to know that the toy isn't his brother, but something bought for his mother to play with, a substitute child.

I don't think it's a story I want to write: it's very nearly unbearable as it is, and it becomes worse when I think about how it changes if the mecha toy is actually a human who is abandoned. "You won't understand the reasons, but I have to leave you here." - "Is it a game? When will you come back for me?"

Monica drives out of the story then. She is really still so completely emotionally screwed up that she fails in all possible directions to be a convincing character. I mean really: doing this to her mecha toy makes sense neither if she's fully aware it's a mecha, nor if on some level she thinks he's a real boy. Gigolo Joe walks into the story then - a mecha programmed to be the best possible lover, a toy who becomes the toy's parent.

AI:AI is about what happens when you create intelligent machines and treat them like things: in a sense, it already is a Keptverse story....


Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today!

Current Mood: tired
Tags: , ,

June 30th, 2009

10:14 pm: Zulu said Fred
1. What is your greatest ambition 1) for today, 2) for the month, 3) for the year?

1.1 For today: to compile the email bulletin. 1.2 For June or for July? I could be perverse and say June, which would be the same as for today, wouldn't it? For July: to launch my new website effectively, and to finish writing the latest fanfic. Or I'll get killed. 1.3 To get my photoblogging back on line and to cope with work without losing track of home.

2. You can change one law. What is it, and what does it become?

I would amend the 1975 Marriage Act so that same-sex couples could get married. Oh, that's awfully serious. I would change the Hollywood Law that makes it impossible to have two women talking to each other about plot stuff instead of teh menz, and so from now on all films and TV series would pass the Bechdel Test. Is that too frivolous? I think I want to repeal the law of gravity, so that we can all fly whenever we want to.

3. What's your favourite website to visit?

I wondered how to answer this one. xkcd because it always makes me smile? www.guardian.co.uk because I habitually turn to it for news? insanejournal.com or redbubble or feministsf - the blog for obvious reasons?

No, I think in all honesty it's much simpler than that: www.google.com. Sorry.

4. What's something you are or have been fannish about, and how would you pimp it?

Depends what it was. If Blake's 7, probably start with fanfic, and move on to episodes only when actually begged to do so. If Star Trek, probably begin and end with fanfic, plus maybe carefully selected bits of episodes that are genuinely OK, mostly because Spock and McCoy are gazing into each other's eyes. If ST:tng, I'd probably try to start off with "Chain of Command", because that's certainly what hooked me, or possibly just all the Picard/Q episodes. Especially the one where Q licks Picard's ear. Or the one where Q and Picard are tucked up naked in bed together. If The Professionals, same technique as for B7. If MacGyver, make them watch the Murdoc episodes until sufficiently convinced this is the primary pairing, then introduce them to the sincere yet limited M/M fanfic. If M*A*S*H... well, who could fail to melt at the thought of Hawkeye/Mulcahy? They're just too adorable.

5. Beanie caps: height of fashion, or accessory disaster?

Disaster. That was easy.

You know the rules: if you want to be interviewed, ask me!


Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today!

Current Mood: geeky
Tags: , , , , , , ,

May 24th, 2009

06:07 pm: Jeeves & Wooster flashfic: Straight Face
Inspired by dialogue with [info]whatho and [info]mllesatine. Much thanks.

The private relationship of a gentleman with his gentleman's gentleman )


Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today!

Current Mood: amused
Tags: , , ,

May 6th, 2009

09:44 am: Some moral and legal issues involved in copyright violation
Dear [info]telesilla,

Every time I see a member of the fanfic community attempting to apply the laws of copyright to themselves, it makes me boggle. Apparently it's okay to dismiss/ignore copyright law when it's, oh say, Acme Shark's copyright on everything connected with the SG universe, but if it's comments on an LJ being moved without your permission? OMG UR IN MAH COPYRIGHT VIOLATIN ME!

There are a bunch of issues here:

I'm a fanfic writer (and a fanfic fan). I break copyright all the time, and I read fanfic that breaks copyright all the time. But, I do see a moral - if not a legal - distinction, between:
- Violating copyright of a film or TV series, where the creators and the owner are not the same people (and where there are a multiplicity of creators: the scriptwriter, the director, the actor, etc).
- Violating copyright of a novel or story where the creator/owner is either dead and therefore past caring, or is alive and is cool with fanfic (however expressed - "cool with fanfic" can include "Why would you want to do that? Make sure I never officially find out about it, OK?")
- Violating copyright of a novel or story where the creator/owner is alive and has made clear they do not want anyone writing fanfic about it.

The first one I feel fine about; the second, I don't see any real issues with; the third I don't feel fine about and would in general try to avoid.

Fanfic itself has a wide range of copyright - it's far from being as clearcut as the "None of this is legal!" people would have you believe. Satire is explicitly legally protected; there is a strong argument to be made that written fanfic of a visual creation is not a violation of copyright (may be a trademark violation); and a whole stack of other stuff.

Then there is the copyright inherent not in fiction, but in personal letters. The legal owner of a letter is the person to whom it was sent (or who has bought it from that person). The copyright-holder is the person who wrote the words, and that person has a right to say who will and will not publish the words. Again: I'm talking moral, not legal distinctions. A person who sees no problem violating the copyright in Gladiator by writing fanfic about the characters, may see moral issues in republishing Russell Crowe's personal letters.

The distinction is:

In writing this comment to your IJ, I make you the legal owner of this copy of the comment. (I also repost it to my journal, reaffirming my ownership of the copyright.) Saving it to your hard drive might be considered a form of re-publication, but I'm not the music industry. Republishing it elsewhere - for example, were you to port your IJ over to DW - is a clear violation of copyright.

Now, you are right, of course, in asserting that it's a violation of copyright that the copyright holders can't do an effin' thing about, realistically: I'm sure Denise bloody Paolucci was counting on this when she made this option available. But it is not nonsense for people to point out that you are, in fact, violating their copyright to their personal comments, even if they are fanfic fans who routinely write fanfic that violates the copyright of half a dozen Hollywood corporations

And finally, of course:

What I might be good with if I'm asked first, politely, for my permission, I may be less happy with if my permission is taken for granted, and am likely to get even less happy with if the person doing it is shouting "I'm going to do this and you can't stop me, so there!"

Best,

Yonmei

(posted as a comment here)

Current Mood: irritated
Tags: , , ,

January 29th, 2008

03:53 pm: Ooh, new friends!
*waves hi!*

Tea? Or coffee? I will brew up a big cafetiere and a big pot of tea, and there's some decaf tea of various sorts in that cupboard over there. Do you take hot milk with your coffee? Fancy a ginger biscuit? Mmm, me too. Here *offers jar*

fred the meme )

Tags: , , , ,

January 5th, 2006

02:39 pm: The Timberlake/Mulcahy popslash thing
I said: "You've got me liking ... popslash ...what will happen next?" (in response to this series).
[info]flambeau asked: "You'll start writing Mulcahy/Timberlake?"

There were a lot of army bases in Korea )

[info]flambeau:
*loves you madly*

I'm not sure which one of us is going to be struck by lightning for this, but: wheeeeee!


The mess tent was full of people, wandering around, drinking a peculiar-looking punch. )

[info]flambeau:
*dies*

*is dead*

(Oh, dear. Maybe it was for me.)


Current Mood: bouncy
Tags: , ,

January 3rd, 2006

10:34 am: Fannish words
Reference list of fannish words, with date of earliest use where known.

They've got "slash" with "antedating 1984" as a date - I know I must have friends who have earlier references to it in print. (I probably do, but not very much earlier - I only started buying slash zines in 1984, so any print references I own will be only a year or two earlier, and I'm fairly sure it was around as a word in the 1970s.) And they have K/S, but there are all the other mediafan and slashfan words to cite.

(Site found via [info]surliminal.)

Tags:

February 1st, 2004

04:55 pm: Fred Resurrected III
Dougs asked me questions, and I answered )

If you want to continue this meme, ask in comments to be interviewed: I'll give you five questions: when you answer them in your journal, ask people if they want to be interviewed by you, and comment here again with a link to your answers.

Tags: ,

January 2nd, 2004

09:55 am: Yuletide treasures, pt 3
twenty-one tales from yuletide treasures )

Tags: , ,

June 9th, 2003

07:34 pm: Fred continues to multiply...
[info]mhw interviewed me:

1) Do you still write much slash? and did you ever think, when you showed me the K/S stuff and I was decidedly perplexed and not-at-all-sure, that I might end up years later writing slash?

Yes. I never think. )

2) Do you think you'll ever move away from Edinburgh? if you had to leave, where would you move to?

I did. But I came back. )

3) How do you think you've changed since we last met?

ten years after )

4) How did you select your LJ name, and what, if anything, does it signify?

yonmei is... )

5) At the wave of a magic wand, I find myself solvent and mobile again, and shall be able to come up to Edinburgh for a few days. There must be oodles of stuff there we haven't seen or done together: what would you suggest for a splendid day's itinerary?

morning, noon, and night )

If you want Fred to continue propagating, ask me to ask you questions.

Tags: , , , , ,

January 12th, 2003

06:59 pm: Double drabble, drat it!
This was inspired by a conversation on the Pros-Lit list last night, concerning a panel proposed for this year's Escapade. I won't say who said she planned to show up with a Uzi...

What killed Pros fandom? )

Tags: , , ,
Powered by InsaneJournal