yonmei

Recent Entries

You are viewing the most recent 3 entries

June 9th, 2008

03:57 pm: Three gifts of words
One reason why I love words so much is that words can, unlike any other form of art or making, be made and kept by the maker, given to others and still remain the maker's, shared with still others by the recipient and still remain the same gift, enhanced by being given.

First, I found (via Feministe's great Sunday tradition of shameless self-promotion), this poem: "Don’t write a poem about rape" by Julie Buffaloe-Yoder, first published by Calyx: A Journal of Art and Literature by Women in summer 1992. I don't want to quote from the poem: I want you, if you can bear it, to go there and read it all. (And thank you, hysperia, for linking to it.)

Here's part of the background of how it came to be written:
During my second year as an undergrad, someone very close to me was raped. It was a horrific experience, complete with guns, knives, and torture, like a scene from a Law & Order SVU episode. She was, needless to say, quite emotionally scarred.

A few years later, I wrote a poem about it and submitted it to a literary journal. I received an unbelievable response from the editor. He took the time to type a six page, single spaced letter in which he ranted about how he would never, ever publish a poem about rape, because he was so tired of hearing women cry and moan about the subject. In his opinion, women who get raped usually “have it coming,” because of the provocative way they dress or act around men. In his words, he was “sick of wenchy women poets who are always bashing men.”


Then there's two excerpts from a recent speech by an author I thought I was familiar with:
"So why do I talk about the benefits of failure? Simply because failure meant a stripping away of the inessential. I stopped pretending to myself that I was anything other than what I was, and began to direct all my energy into finishing the only work that mattered to me. Had I really succeeded at anything else, I might never have found the determination to succeed in the one arena I believed I truly belonged. I was set free, because my greatest fear had already been realised, and I was still alive, and I still had a daughter whom I adored, and I had an old typewriter and a big idea. And so rock bottom became the solid foundation on which I rebuilt my life."

I read that, and, knowing who the author was, was dumbstruck: because yes. Suddenly, I want to read her next book.

I stopped and thought about it, and did some other stuff, and then went on to read the rest, thinking that she could not possibly have anything to say that would resonate with me more than what she had already said, but, further down, after she spoke about her work with Amnesty International:
"If you choose to use your status and influence to raise your voice on behalf of those who have no voice; if you choose to identify not only with the powerful, but with the powerless; if you retain the ability to imagine yourself into the lives of those who do not have your advantages, then it will not only be your proud families who celebrate your existence, but thousands and millions of people whose reality you have helped transform for the better. We do not need magic to change the world, we carry all the power we need inside ourselves already: we have the power to imagine better."


That would be J. K. Rowling, speaking at the Commencement Address to Harvard, June 2008.

Because, yes.

Current Mood: impressed
Tags: , , , , ,

October 21st, 2007

09:24 am: Actually, I’m kind of annoyed.
For two reasons: One, saying Dumbledore was gay after Book 7 was published and there aren’t going to be any more is kind of a cop-out. Would have taken a lot more guts (and been a lot more interesting) if she’d spelled it out in Book 7, rather than leaving it subtextual and admitting it only after Potterdammerung is well over.

The other: Lupin was gay. Tonks was a dyke. They got married off to each other as soon as possible after some fans pointed out to Rowling that Lupin “read” as gay, and they were both killed off - in fact, Tonks was never seen alive again after she married Lupin. Outing Lupin and Tonks would have been something I’d have welcomed, no matter when it happened.

And finally, though I admit this beyond what you can expect of any writer: Harry Potter is probably one of the most widely-read children’s books in the world, and certainly the most widely-read children’s book in recent publishing history. It would have been a fantastic thing to do for LGBT children at school if Neville (or any of the kids - but I had hopes for Neville) had turned out to be gay, living with (in a civil partnership with!) another man. But no. He gets married off heterosexually like the rest of the kids, and the only gay man Rowling will admit to in the Potterverse is Dumbledore, and she won’t admit that he ever had a relationship with anyone except unrequited love for an evil wizard.

(Oh yeah, this is the Dumbledore was gay revelation from J. K. Rowling. If you hadn't already heard.)

(This is based on a comment I made on feministsf - the blog!.)

---
Update: The best kind of fannish commentary: makes you weep and go squee at the same time. Gay-Albus Motivational Posters.

Current Mood: annoyed
Tags: , ,

February 5th, 2007

12:14 pm: Hallowed Potter and the Deathly Harry: 21st July
Apparently the publishing phenomenon of the century is drawing to a close: on the evening of 20th July people will be queuing up outside bookshops, waiting for the tick past midnight to charge in, grab their copy, flip to the end, and find out if:

25 plot points for the last Harry Potter novel )

Do your own 25 plot points: we'll meet up after it's all over and compare them. ;-)

Tags: , ,
Powered by InsaneJournal