![[info]](http://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
: Dissecting Orson Scott Card, part 3
Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here. I'm just going to hope that you've already read Parts 1 & 2 dissecting this lying piece of bigotry, but in summary: in Part 1, OSC made various claims for monogamous nuclear-family marriage, not many of which were actually true. In Part 2, OSC is arguing that civilisation stands by agonic rule over hedonic natural impulses - which is also untrue.
( OSC claims the 1950s were pretty good: why doesn't that surprise me? )
( There are families, and then there are pretended family units )
( Does OSC have gay friends? )
That's it, I can't stand doing this any more tonight. Part 4 will most likely appear on Friday morning [Edit, Thursday am: or Saturday morning: I really ought to be working on my CV rather than messing around with this.]
Edit: click here for part four.
Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here. I'm just going to hope that you've already read Parts 1 & 2 dissecting this lying piece of bigotry, but in summary: in Part 1, OSC made various claims for monogamous nuclear-family marriage, not many of which were actually true. In Part 2, OSC is arguing that civilisation stands by agonic rule over hedonic natural impulses - which is also untrue.
( OSC claims the 1950s were pretty good: why doesn't that surprise me? )
( There are families, and then there are pretended family units )
( Does OSC have gay friends? )
That's it, I can't stand doing this any more tonight. Part 4 will most likely appear on Friday morning [Edit, Thursday am: or Saturday morning: I really ought to be working on my CV rather than messing around with this.]
Edit: click here for part four.