yonmei

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
09:39 am: On striving to think the best of people
I read on Shakesville that Emma Thompson had signed the petition supporting Roman Polanski's right not to be prosecuted for raping a 13-year-old girl - an act which the petition claims (translate) is normally prescribed in Europe.

Opinions may honestly vary on whether bringing Polanski to trial for raping an underage girl is the best thing for Polanski's victim (see Avedon on the Sideshow) but the idea that Polanski has some kind of right to go free because he committed the crime thirty years ago and he is a famous film director who ought not be treated like a "common terrorist", as the petition advocates, is beyond reprehensible.

I wrote to Emma Thompson's UK agent:
I'm a long-term fan of Emma Thompson's, and have supported and admired her work against the exploitation of young women in prostitution/statutory rape.

I was very distressed, and I assume Ms Thompson is also, to see that someone had attempted to damage her reputation by posting her name as if she were a supporter of Bernard Henri Levi's petition to keep Roman Polanski safe from being prosecuted for raping a 13-year-old girl.

This is so contrary to Ms Thompson's reputation as a campaigner against exploitation and abuse that I could only suppose that someone had sent an e-mail as if in her name, which naturally the compilers of the petition had not checked to make sure was valid.

The petition is here: (link redacted)

I hope you can manage to have this pro-rapist campaign take her name down and apologize for not confirming that she was a supporter of a petition that no one in their right minds could have supposed she would back.

I would very much appreciate if you would let me know when that has happened: although one of the people who linked me to the petition said that like me she could not believe it, I'm afraid that many will simply see the name and suppose that all of Emma Thompson's good work against the rape and exploitation of young girls was hypocritical. That would damage both Ms Thompson's reputation, and even more importantly, the cause for which she has worked so hard.


Yes, I admit, I'm politely lying through my teeth ("I'm sure you didn't MEAN to do that!") and I bet she did sign it, even if enough fan mail could get her to take her name off it. And there are other actors on the list I really also now hate for thinking that Polanski ought to be allowed to get away with rape because he's so famous and such a great film director that the law ought not to be applied to him as if he were just one of the terrorists kidnapped by the US. (Not that terrorists kidnapped by the US have a trial to look forward to, nor are they arrested on a warrant for which there is evidence that can be shown in court.) But as the petition makes clear, signing it affirms your support for the idea it's wrong for Polanski to be treated as if he was a common person, and the actors and other celebrities who have signed the petition have made clear their support for a two-tiered legal system, as well as for the principle that a famous rapist ought not to be forced to stand trial for his crime.

Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today! Adopt one today!

Current Mood: angry
Tags: ,

Comments

[User Picture]
From:[info]threeoranges
Date:dayordNovember 2009 10:24 am (UTC)
(Link)
I know an actress/model who portrayed one of the exploited sex workers in THE JOURNEY installation, so that congruity between Thompson's campaign and this supposed support for Polanski was the first thing that came to mind when I saw your post.

Maybe Thompson read one of these articles which convinced her that Polanski "didn't get a fair trial"? (I can't see why: nothing I've read convinces me that he's an innocent being set up by The Man.) Whatever possessed her to sign it, I'm sure sending her "concerned fanmail" (clearly someone is impersonating you on the internets! Oh NOES!) is the best way to persuade her to withdraw.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 10:40 am (UTC)
(Link)
I'm told that some of the celebrities on the list are justifying it by claiming that international film festivals ought to be neutral territory, with criminals invited to them guaranteed freedom from arrest while attending. And admittedly, if anyone in authority in Switzerland outright lied to Roman Polanski that he wouldn't be arrested on arrival, I would think this was ... tacky. But "tacky" next to "rapist", and I'm just.

I don't know where these people - all the signatories - are coming from, except that they really feel it would be wrong to treat the great Roman Polanski as if he were just like anyone else.
[User Picture]
From:[info]threeoranges
Date:dayordNovember 2009 12:16 pm (UTC)
(Link)
international film festivals ought to be neutral territory

"We're like ambassadors! For ART! We should get diplomatic immunity!"

Er... no...
[User Picture]
From:[info]anysia
Date:dayordNovember 2009 10:31 am (UTC)
(Link)
This wouldn't even be in contention if instead of Polanski, it was some 'regular guy' that did this. He drugged and sodomized a 13 yr old child. he ran away so he wouldn't have to face the penalty. He needs to be held accountable and pay for his crime. End of story.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 10:42 am (UTC)
(Link)
I think that's exactly the point; the idea behind the petition is that if you're of the elite, you oughtn't to be treated as if you were subject to the ordinary laws.
[User Picture]
From:[info]afrai
Date:dayordNovember 2009 02:11 pm (UTC)
(Link)
This is a really good idea -- sending fake-concerned fan mail, I mean. I was so deeply disappointed to find out that Emma Thompson had signed the petition; I just cannot understand how she could have thought it justifiable.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 08:02 am (UTC)
(Link)
Yeah. I know. It's just... heartbreaking is how Shakesville described it.
[User Picture]
From:[info]ide_cyan
Date:dayordNovember 2009 10:28 pm (UTC)
(Link)
There's a new entry here about someone bringing a petition to Emma Thompson in person to also ask her to withdraw her signature:
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/11/emma-update.html
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 05:53 pm (UTC)
(Link)
And she has. Good.
[User Picture]
From:[info]copracat
Date:dayordNovember 2009 02:56 pm (UTC)
(Link)
he petition supporting Roman Polanski's right not to be prosecuted for raping a 13-year-old girl

I thought he had been convicted - in fact had pled guilty - and had skipped out on sentencing and it was that breach for which he is being extradited.

Regardless of that, yes to everything else.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 08:03 am (UTC)
(Link)
...possibly. I thought there had been a criminal trial in the offing, which he had skipped bail on, and is still a fugitive from: and subsequently there had been a civil trial, which could take place in his absence, and which he had lost (but has not paid the damages).

[User Picture]
From:[info]copracat
Date:dayordNovember 2009 09:15 am (UTC)
(Link)
Let's put this in celebrity perspective: Robert Downey Jr has spent more than a year in jail for drug and not turning up convictions. Polanski was going to get 90 whole days.
[User Picture]
From:[info]tigresslilly
Date:dayordNovember 2009 03:11 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I don't get that whole petition. This guy is a rapist. Not a "gray" rapist as if such thing exists. I mean the girl was thirteen, drugged, and said no repeatedly. What more does a guy have to do to prove he's morally reprehensible?

He fled sentencing. He refused to pay a civil suit he lost to the survivor and her family. He's not the one who's being persecuted or who's suffering.

That we even have a debate going on regarding whether this guy needs a real trial and to serve a sentence if found guilty completely baffles and disgusts me.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 08:04 am (UTC)
(Link)
I think the thing we're not "getting" is that this guy is Roman Polanski, and evidently his fellow elites believe it to be wrong that he should be locked up like a common criminal.
[User Picture]
From:[info]babydraco
Date:dayordNovember 2009 03:36 pm (UTC)
(Link)
What bothers me is that these people don't seem to understand he *already* got a second chance, before, when they said "pay her family x amount of money" and he ran away instead of paying it.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yonmei
Date:dayordNovember 2009 08:07 am (UTC)
(Link)
What bothers me is that these people think he deserves to escape the legal penalty for his crime.
Powered by InsaneJournal